Wednesday, March 22, 2006

some random thoughts

Now while my wife rocks the baby to sleep, I've got a spare moment to finally jot down some thoughts that have been burning my mental square acreage . . .

  • This Apple Vs. PC thing is OLD AND TIRED

    So I thought that this was pretty much a dead issue . . . I mean it's 2006 already. Hasn't the world already moved on? Apparently not . . . seems this issue tends to rear it's ugly head every month or so among my coworkers. You know, the ipod comes up as a topic every so often, which eventually leads to discussions about the Mac OS. The great majority of coworkers (being PC heads) either openly scoff, expressively roll their eyes or look like they just smelled a turd. Then the graphic designer, a lone standard bearer with a predestined blind allegiance to all things Apple, jumps into the fray, bravely defending the Mac like it was her family's coat of arms.

    Okay, y'all need to get a grip. First off, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT STUPID COMPUTERS!!!! The kind of fervor that froths up from both camps should be reserved for one's spouse, children, family or country . . . NOT A FREAKING PRODUCT!!!!! A computer is a tool. You can have a preference for one tool over another, just don't act like that this tool gave birth to your first born child. And this also goes double for those COKE VS. PEPSI acolytes. IT'S FREAKING SODA!!!! You're going to war over CARBONATED COLORED SUGAR WATER!!!!

    Okay some quick perspective here . . . the MAC OS was built to be a product; something to work as elegantly and as hassle-free as a microwave oven. Creative types usually, but not always, want to know their tool's capabilities. Knowing what the tool can or can't do frees them up to actually start being creative. The PC OS (Windows, Linux, etc.) is more like a blank slate, a universe of possibilities that a user controls through language. If there is a need, then be assured that 80 different programmers will write up 299 different sofware to fill that need.

    I'm already spending too long on this. So to cut to the chase, and for full disclosure, I'm a Mac agnostic. I'll prefer to use the Mac, but if someone offers me a free PC with all the bells and whistle I require, I would be stupid not to take it. And for those of you religious freako "MACAZOIDS" out there who would call me a traitor . . . why in the hell should I show loyalty to something I GIVE MY HARD EARNED MONEY TO? Apple should be loyal to ME, not the other way around. The only reason they're in business is because enough people are convinced that their product has value. The minute they don't (it sure seemed that way in the mid 90's) I'm outta here. The ipod saved that company's ass, no matter how good their OS is. Cuz the simple truth is that any PC based OS is good enough to live with. It does the job. Maybe not as cleanly, maybe not as elegantly, but it will do what the MAC does. And at much better prices too.

  • What's cool to a 25 year old, will just be pathetic when he hits 35

    Act your age people. Realize your limitations. This is just another variation on 'the old man at the club' Chris Rock joke. Move on people. Leave the throwing-up-in-the-morning-at-a-dumpster-just-caught-syphillis-from-my-skanky-one-night-stand activities to the young. They can take the hit. They've got the time and energy to make up for it. A 35 year old guy trying to act like a 25 year old cool guy has the danger of just looking pathetic and worn out. It's called the 'circle of life' for a reason.

    AND YES, I KNOW I'M THE GUY WHO COLLECTS SUPERMAN DOLLIES, but I don't let it interfere with my real adult life . . . there are boundaries you do not cross . . . learn them.

  • And speaking of Superman . . . is it me or does the actor in the new Superman movie look a little gay?

    I mean, the Superman costume is not the most macho thing to begin with, but the new Superman looks like some ballet dancer or ice skater prancing around all delicate and shit. I want my Superman to look somewhat more manly. I mean Chris Reeves never looked gay to me and that 70s outfit of his is a quicksand trap of gayness. I'll hold final judgement until the movie comes out, but I'm a little worried here.


That's all I got for now. Time to go to sleep.

Labels: , ,

7 Comments:

At 10:40 PM, Blogger mikshir said...

ok, i am now even more ashamed at the drunk-induced puking i've done in the past couple years. guess i should get tested for s-t-d's too. time to get my HMO crap in order.

speaking of computers... very happy to have to have taken the time to finally make myself a home linux-box again. i'm still working on a deadline but it's nice to do it on my couch with the tv on in the background.

 
At 2:57 PM, Blogger Kilatzin said...

dude, i am not talking about you.es

you act your age. there are a couple of guys i know who are over 37 and still carry on like they're 25. They've got the interests, hobbies and speech patterns of 25 year olds. Now ordinarily, I would admire such an action, but these days I don't know. They seem to be stuck in a time-rut and I wonder how much of it is vanity, how much is stubborness, and how much is cluelessness.

 
At 8:58 PM, Blogger caninecologne said...

yes, the new superman does look a little gay...come on you read that article i sent you...he probably did blow the director in a hot tub...

when has a superhero ever looked NOT gay?
tights...cape...you do the math

sorry can't comment on t/computers thing...i'm a virtual retard compared to the lot of you...i know the rudimentary basics and that's all i need to know

i haven't gotten a male enhancement ad yet and hopefully won't!!!

 
At 8:03 PM, Blogger Ms. Mamma said...

Hi Kilatzin! I really don't want to be an interloper, but I just have to tell you, I enjoy your commentary, especially about your bambino. As a Macstress, I think the big thing is if you use something creatively and in a way that makes you feel something positive, you cling to it. It becomes something more than just a glorified appliance. Truly, a tired argument I agree, but if anyone wants to take MY Mac, they'll have to pry it from my cold dead hands.

 
At 8:29 PM, Blogger Kilatzin said...

Welcome Ms. Mamma! you're welcome to write or opine any time!!!

To clarify, it's not the preference for one over another that bothers me . . . it's the venom that seems to spit out of both camps whenever the debate is brought up. Truly some spiteful comments out there that should be reserved for one's workplace enemies, not operating systems. It's just that I've seen both sides and appreciate them for what they both bring to the table. both sides have the blind fervor of religious fundmentalism seeping in their pores.

They should worry about more substancial things in life . . . like Brad and Angelina . . . things like that. things that matter.

(;^)

 
At 6:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah! What's up with Brangelina. Are they going to tie the knot? Oh bother, they're bot so hot who cares. Kfed, now thats another story, nasty, greasy, backwoodsy (hey pa, I found 'er out behind the shed. Can I keep 'er? [squeels heard in background]), ick.

 
At 7:31 PM, Blogger caninecologne said...

i like how you keep your priorities straight there...

maniston was fug and angelina is way too hot for anyone...i wonder if their kid is going to look as good as they do...unlike seal and heidi klum's baby...poor kid.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home